PDA Street

Home | News | Reviews | Features | FREE Downloads | Forums | Compare PDA Prices | Compare SmartPhone Prices

PDAStreet.com > Hardware Reviews > Review: E62 - Nokia's Answer to RIM BlackBerry - User Opinions

Review: E62 - Nokia's Answer to RIM BlackBerry - User Opinions

[ Back to Article   |   Submit Your Opinion ]

Total: 3 Opinions  
Displaying: 1 - 3
<< First | Prev || Next | Last >>

PoJiVRaKzHxaVbCgjQ
Nkxna8 vopmqtufygld, [url=http://eameabfrkwqu.com/]eameabfrkwqu[/url], [link=http://uxykkebcdxxy.com/]uxykkebcdxxy[/link], http://bfpvnutoydab.com/

Submitted by: nmwxlqkmq
Email: yhuuii@lfhbwg.com
Location: TxeCvrrNc
Date Added: 2008-11-05

Decent, if not slow, PDA phone
Mostly in response to the previous reviewer's negative review; he apparently did not read the manual.

Yes, the phone's response in navigating the interface is slow, but I have seen Treos that are slower. Video playback is also bad, but this is a business device, not an entertainment device. I have a Palm T|X if I want to play back high-quality video.

As to the previous reviewer's complaint that numbers like 1-800-CINGULAR, if he would have read his manual he would have learned that by using the "Chr" key he can type in the actual letters without knowing what numbers they stand for, and the phone does the translation of letters to numbers for him. This is a great feature I've not seen anywhere else.

The strong points for me are the voice-enabled tools (one can voice dial without prerecording, and it has Voice Aid to use the phone without actually seeing the display); a *full keyboard* for typing text and e-mail and web addresses (I do far more e-mail and text and data than I do calling on this device); and a FULL HTML web browser in addition to the standard WAP offering, with the ability to see where you are on a page overview inset.

The ability to add additional Symbian applications is a huge plus.

Overall, a very good effort by Nokia at a "large-form-factor" palm-type PDA/phone device. If you are looking for *real* power, though, you may be better off with a Palm Treo or Windows Smartphone; but if you need something less expensive than one of those, this is a good choice.

Submitted by: Steven Buehler
Email: swbuehler@gmail.com
Location: Lakeland, FL
Date Added: 2007-07-07


Too slow to be a PDA; Too PDA to be a cell phone
I am amazed at the number of positive reviews and recommendations I read that convinced me to buy this phone. THIS THING IS AWEFUL!!

What I was looking for: A sensible data organizer and phone with good computer synchronization, decent video playback, and mp3 player.

What I got: A phone that is made to look and appear impressive but is utterly gutless. Want to see if you missed any calls? Push button for Log&gt; wait 2 seconds. Push button for Open Log&gt; wait 2 seconds. Push button for Missed calls&gt; wait 3 seconds. Sure, it's only 7 seconds, which doesn't sound long, but it feels long when all you want is to see that last call you missed! It's that way for every feature of the phone. It is annoyingly, irritatingly slow.

I was excited to put video on the phone and messed with it for a long time. The phone was too slow to play back decent video and would therefore only play music videos at the same low 3gp quality (or lower) as you'll get on any other normal cell phone.

The mp3 player annoyingly only plays one song at a time. That means you must go back to the file, Open the song, and press play for every new song. No continuous play. There's probably 3rd party software though.

I had another Nokia phone that also had Infrared capabilities. The phones would not link up to copy my contacts over, as Nokia promotes. There is also no import/export feature in the included software for contacts from another csv file or other source. All I could find was acceptance for .wab files (outlook).

The buttons are hard to push without accidentally pushing the wrong one. Oh, and if someone gives you an 800 number like 1-800-Cingular, then you'd better try to remember what numbers correspond to the letter C, I, N, etc. because it's not on this phone. It also interferes with my computer speakers, monitor, and telephone land line at work. I don't think the FCC would be happy about this.

This phone would be alright if it weren't SO DARN SLOW!!!! If you decide to get this phone anyways, I highly recommend that you ensure a return policy on it. My phone is going back. Not only did it fall far short of being an efficient organizer AND by so designing it, it also loses the capability of even being a decent cell phone. I'll take my 2 year old Nokia of this anyday. I have a feeling there will be a lot of refurbished E-62's available in the near future.

I have read many, many positive reviews on this phone. I went back to learn which sites not to trust anymore. Reading carefully it appears those who reviewed it are columnists, paid reviewers, or someone trying to boost the hits on their website. Not those who actually own the phone.

Submitted by: Brett
Email: valiantrm@hotmail.com
Location: Newark, DE
Date Added: 2007-02-13


Total: 3 Opinions  
Displaying: 1 - 3
<< First | Prev || Next | Last >>

[ Back to Article   |   Submit Your Opinion ]




PDA/Smartphone Newsletters
text html text html
X WindowsMobileToday X PDAStreet
X Palm Boulevard X SmartPhoneToday
X BlackBerryToday X Pocket PC Wire
X iPhoneGuide      

Other Personal Technology Newsletters
X Sharky Extreme X WiFi Planet


internet.comearthweb.comDevx.commediabistro.comGraphics.com

Search:

Jupitermedia Corporation has two divisions: Jupiterimages and JupiterOnlineMedia

Jupitermedia Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Tech Jobs | Shopping | E-mail Offers